Skip to main content

I am having a rough time finding the thesis paragraph for a critical essay called "A Worn Path" The Eternal Quest of Welty's Phoenix Jackson, by...

Yes, this is a challenging essay! To find the thesis, we should read through it, looking for a place where the author has stated some original idea that much of the essay supports and discusses. 


Notice how Saunders opens the essay by describing the story (called "A Worn Path") and by explaining what another critic, Isaacs, has already said about the story and what it means.


Then Saunders writes:



All things considered, Isaacs' analogies are quite astute and provide us with the basis for a most interesting perspective: Phoenix Jackson is involved in that crucial search for meaning in life that is founded on basic Christian principles and designed, upon completion, to provide her with life-giving sustenance. Even if she is, due both to her advancing years and the nature of her difficult mission, about to die by the story's end, it is only so that life might be affirmed through acquisition of the medicine her grandson needs.



That phrase in bold above is a big clue. The first sentence in the paragraph above is saying, "The other guy's ideas are interesting, and they support my new idea." The colon shows that Saunders is about to present his new idea. There, he explains his own thesis (that the character of Phoenix is on a successful search for meaning and for "life-giving sustenance.") That original idea, which I've put in italics above, is the thesis of Saunders's essay. So, the paragraph above that I've quoted can be called the thesis paragraph.


We should check out the rest of the essay to make sure it mostly supports the thesis we've identified.


From there, Saunders goes on to describe how another critic, Bartel, partly agrees and partly disagrees with Saunders's view. He explains why the character Phoenix is like a mythological phoenix, which goes on to live again after a kind of death. Then Saunders explains how the ideas of yet another critic, Moss, relate to Saunders's own thesis. He uses that comparison to launch his way into a comparison of Phoenix to two other characters in literature, before going into a very detailed explanation of Phoenix's traits (as a "gifted child of nature," as "the designated protector of another worthy innocent," and as the representation of "unqualified persistence"). Those three ideas that I just listed make up a big chunk of the essay and all serve to support Saunders's main point.


The last few paragraphs of the essay talk about why the main point matters (because it gave hope to the readers of the story).

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...
Post a Comment
Read more