Skip to main content

How does Romeo's quote "The exchange of thy love's faithful vow for mine" show Romeo is loyal to Juliet?

Let's first get a better understanding of where this quote occurs within the play's narrative. Romeo and Juliet have just met for the first time at the Capulet ball, and, although they did not have a long time to converse there due to the oppressive, ever-watching eye of Juliet's family, they were both equally struck by the force of love. 


In Act Two, Scene Two, Romeo sneaks into the Capulets' gardens to admire Juliet from afar. He climbs up to her balcony to proclaim his love for her, swearing his affection by the "blessèd moon" above, but Juliet is dissatisfied by this vow due to the moon's ever-changing nature. Their conversation is short and sweet, and Juliet attempts to hurry off back to her bedroom, bidding her love good night and proclaiming that she hopes their love will have grown by the time they meet again.


It is now Romeo's turn to be dissatisfied, and he rather coyly asks of her, "O, wilt thou leave me so unsatisfied?" When Juliet demands to know what satisfaction she can possibly give him that night, Romeo responds, "The exchange of thy love's faithful vow to mine." Romeo is essentially asking for a more permanent commitment than Juliet's rather ambiguous reference to their love as "when next we meet," which seems to translate to a non-comittal "well, see you soon!" in the eyes of a modern audience. Romeo wants Juliet to vow her love for him is true so he may do the same. 


This is a display of Romeo's loyalty to Juliet because he is the one pushing for a verbal commitment. Juliet is content to go to bed having merely seen and spoken to her beloved once more without the knowledge of when, where, or if she will see him again; Romeo, on the other hand, craves this knowledge. He wants confirmation that his feelings are reciprocated and that he may give his affection singularly to Juliet. Whether you call this behavior needy or romantic, one thing is sure: Romeo now only has eyes for Juliet.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...
Post a Comment
Read more