Skip to main content

What was the relationship between the Cold War and the US Civil Rights Movement?

The major relationship between the Cold War and the Civil Rights Movement was that the Cold War caused American leaders to support civil rights more than they might otherwise have done.


The Cold War was, of course, a struggle between the US and the Soviet Union.  Both sides wanted to dominate the world and spread their ideology as widely as possible.  What this meant was that the two sides had to compete to gain the favor of various countries around the world.  Civil rights was one issue that affected, or could affect, the way the other countries viewed the US.  The Soviet Union was able to criticize the US for talking about democracy and human rights while mistreating racial minorities at home.  This made the US look bad to other countries.  It was particularly problematic when the US and the Soviets were competing for the loyalty of non-white countries.  The Soviets could point out to the people of those countries that American democracy did not include rights and respect for people like them.  This was a strong argument against the US and American leaders naturally wanted to make it impossible for the Soviets to use it against them.


Because the US wanted to look better in the eyes of the international community, many American leaders supported the Civil Rights Movement more than they might have done if it had been purely a domestic issue.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more