Skip to main content

What is the collective name given to the gases H2 and O2?

There is no specific collective name that refers only to the molecules H2 and O2. The only thing they really have in common is that both molecules are composed of two identical atoms. Thus, we can identify them as belonging to the category of diatomic elements.


The term "diatomic" is simply what it sounds like; two atoms, meaning that the atom will not be found by itself (monatomic) under normal circumstances because of its reactivity. Part of the reason for this is that the atoms, being identical, also have identical electronegativities, and therefore the electrons are equally shared between them in the bond. This isn't to say that alternative bonds are impossible, such as a single oxygen bound to a single fluoride atom, but that the electronegativity difference in these atoms causes the bond to be more energetic, and therefore less favorable, and less stable. It would also be impossible to satisfy the octet rule for this arrangement, further lending to its reactivity, and improving the relative stability of the O-O and F-F arrangements.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more