Skip to main content

Why is feminism controversial?

Why is anything controversial? Because people disagree about how they think the world should be.

Part of what makes feminism controversial is that different people seem to define it differently. The most basic definition is "women should have equal rights to men", which used to be highly controversial (and still is in some parts of the world), but at least within First World countries is largely accepted and agreed upon. There are also much stronger, more specific definitions that fall under the umbrella of "feminism", which can include everything from legal abortion to affirmative consent laws. Many of these more specific policies are where the real controversy lies: Simply agreeing in principle that women deserve equal rights doesn't necessarily convince you that abortion should be legal under all circumstances. They aren't wholly unrelated, but additional premises are needed to tie them together, and that fact often gets ignored.

But part of what makes feminism controversial is... sexism! A lot of people around the world still have some really deep-seated beliefs and attitudes that are extremely sexist. Some of these were probably learned in childhood, or picked up gradually as life experiences; some may even be linked to genetic traits that evolved thousands of years ago. But for whatever reason, a lot of people really do feel strongly that men and women should have fundamentally different roles in society and should not be treated the same way---and those people are going to get angry when you try to do otherwise.

Especially in cultures like the US and Europe where we all agree in principle that women are equal, people tend not to think of these attitudes and beliefs as sexist; but by definition they still are. For instance, there is a common norm "men should hold doors for women"; well, that doesn't sound like such an awful thing, right? But it's directly assigning different social roles to men and women---and that makes it by definition sexist. Benevolent? Sure. Harmless? Maybe. But sexism nonetheless. A lot of people have general ideas about men and women that they don't think of as bias, they just think of them as "how things are".

Finally, one thing that makes sexism in particular very complicated in a way that other forms of bigotry such as racism and ethnocentrism are not is that sex is a real thing. The way we define cultures, nations, and even races is basically arbitrary; it's a socially-constructed phenomenon with little if any real basis in underlying traits. But sex isn't like that; humans actually are, biologically, a sexually dimorphic species, and certain differences between men and women really are genetically defined---testosterone levels, height, and upper body strength are obvious examples. Sometimes it's fairly obvious that a given difference is purely societal (the stereotype "women are bad drivers" can't exactly be something we evolved thousands of years ago), but often it isn't. Many feminists try to deny this and say that there are no real genetic differences between men and women, but that just isn't true. We don't know what differences are genetic; perhaps only a few are. But some definitely are, and we need to face up to that. Clearly human behavior isn't entirely genetic, and I'm not aware of anyone who thinks it is. But it is partly genetic, and many feminists have been strangely unwilling to accept that fact---which very likely contributes to why feminism is so controversial. I think feminists would do themselves a favor by admitting that some differences between men and women are at least partly genetic, and trying to figure out ways to ensure equality despite that fact.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...
Post a Comment
Read more