Skip to main content

What stylistic devices create the atmosphere of children's stories in "Once Upon a Time"?

Gordimer doesn't really get to these devices or her "children's story" until she begins to relate the bedtime story. She begins this story in a very general way, and this serves to suggest that this story is about "any" family in any place or time. It is therefore very accessible to many families:



In a house, in a suburb, in a city, there was a man and his wife who loved each other very much and were living happily ever after. They had a little boy and they loved him very much. They had a cat and a dog that the little boy loved very much. 



Note the simplicity. This is a simple description of a loving family living "happily ever after." This phrase clearly echoes the most famous final line of many fairy tales. The most famous opening line, "once upon a time," only occurs as the story's title. Still, this opening paragraph about the family almost conjures that phrase in the reader's mind. There are typical fairy tale phrases and a simplistic style, both of which are designed for younger reading audiences.


The phrase "happily ever after" is repeated in this story. The family continually tries to live happily ever after. As they increasingly try to transform their house into a fortress, they believe the security the fortress provides will enable them to live happily ever after. The story does end with some gruesome, tragic irony. This seems contrary to what a children's story should be. There are classic fairy tales with gruesome events, even though many of these end with "happily ever after."


Gordimer is doing a lot more than presenting a children's story. She is indirectly addressing social tension in South Africa through this story and the country's uncertain future. She and other South Africans surely wondered about their future as the country struggled to end apartheid. They must have wondered if and when they would or could live happily ever after.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more