Skip to main content

What does Patrick Henry's ''Speech to the Second Virginia Convention'' tell you about life in the United States at the time it was written?

There are several recurring themes in Patrick Henry's stirring Speech to the Second Virginia Convention. First, he warns against hope as an excuse for inaction. He points to the "insidious smile" with which the Crown responded to the latest petition from the colonies. He points to a decade of nonviolent struggle to no avail, and his frustration speaks to the colonists' frustration at their inability to enact changes in the policies of the Crown.


He refers to "warlike preparations which cover our waters and darken our land" and a "martial array" of British troops and ships recently arrived to assist in quelling the unrest. No doubt the arrival of these "warlike preparations" was intended to be a show of British strength, but they instead inflamed the passions of the American rebels.


They certainly inflamed Patrick Henry, and he questions their use:



I ask gentlemen, sir, what means this martial array, if its purpose be not to force us to submission? Can gentlemen assign any other possible motives for it? Has Great Britain any enemy, in this quarter of the world, to call for all this accumulation of navies and armies? No, sir, she has none. They are meant for us; they can be meant for no other. They are sent over to bind and rivet upon us those chains which the British ministry have been so long forging.



The British military presence in the colonies and the repeated denials of peaceful entreaties have only reinforced anger at the yolk of the Crown on the dissatisfied colonials. Henry's speech is a call to arms. In the next month, the first battles, those at Lexington and Concord, would be fought. Patrick Henry's speech is a detailed explanation of the mindset of the colonists as they went to war for their freedom. King George III was unwilling to listen to reason, and had already stationed his military in the colonies in preparation for the coming conflict. Henry's speech is a call to violence: "Give me liberty, or give me death!"

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.