Skip to main content

Who was Pierre Aronnax? On what matter did the New York Herald ask Aronnax to give his views?

In the novel, Pierre Aronnax is a French marine biologist, as well as an Assistant Professor at the National History Museum of Paris.


In the early chapters of the book, we learn that the United States government has invited Dr. Aronnax to join the hunting expedition for a supposed sea monster. Meanwhile, the New York Herald has asked Dr. Aronnax to provide his expert opinion about the cause of all the recent shipwrecks. To date, there are two opinions about these tragedies. The first is that the shipwrecks were caused by a giant sea monster of some sort; the second is that a submarine vessel of enormous dimensions was responsible.


Because he has published a highly acclaimed book on the "Mysteries of the Great Submarine Grounds," Dr. Aronnax is considered an expert on the subject. Compelled by his sense of duty, he proceeds to write an article, arguing for the hypothesis that the shipwrecks were caused by a "sea-unicorn of colossal dimensions."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.