Skip to main content

In the novel To Kill a Mockingbird, why is it weird for an animal to behave the way Tim Johnson did given the time of year?

In Chapter 10, Jem and Scout are outside playing with their air rifles when Jem notices Tim Johnson staggering down the middle of the road. After Calpurnia sees the dog, she immediately recognizes that it is "mad." When Calpurnia speaks to Miss Eula May on the telephone, she says,



“I know it’s February, Miss Eula May, but I know a mad dog when I see one. Please ma’am hurry!” (Lee 58).



Clearly, something is odd about an animal with rabies during the cooler months in Alabama. Apparently, rabies tends to be transmitted more often during the summer months when the weather is warmer which is why Eula May questions Calpurnia. Sheriff Tate then arrives on the scene and gives his rifle to Atticus. Atticus reluctantly takes the weapon and shoots Tim Johnson above his left eye. After witnessing his father's expert marksmanship, Jem is in awe of Atticus' abilities. Miss Maudie then explains why Atticus never bragged about the fact that he was the best shot in Maycomb. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.