Skip to main content

How many stars are there in the universe?

What do you mean, "the universe"? By many standard theories of cosmology, the universe is infinite, so of course the number of stars is also infinite. Even if it's not infinite, it's probably vastly larger than we can see or ever hope to see.

But if you just count the observable universe, which is the part of the universe lying within the cosmic particle horizon, close enough to us that light has had time to reach us since the Big Bang (and due to the expansion of the universe, the cosmic particle horizon is further away from us than simply "age of universe * speed of light"), there are about `10^24` stars, one septillion. ("septillion" sounds made up, but it isn't, except in the way that all words are ultimately made up.)

This is so many stars that if you lined them all up in a cube, that cube would be 100 million stars across; assuming an average diameter of 1 million kilometers, even if the stars were somehow touching each other the cube would still be 100 trillion kilometers wide, meaning that if our sun were in the center, the cube wouldn't actually fit between us and the nearest stars which are about 40 trillion kilometers away.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more