Skip to main content

Find the centroid of the region bounded by the graphs of `y=sqrt(r^2-x^2)` and `y=0`

Given the curves are


`y=sqrt(r^2-x^2)` (this is a circle equation actually, but lets compute the centroid  in a standard way) ,` y=0`


let `f(x) =sqrt(r^2-x^2)`



and `g(x)=0`


In order to find the Centroid of the region bounded by the curves,


first we have to find the area bounded by the curves.


So now in order to find the area , we have to find the intersecting points of the curves. This can be obtained by equating f(x) and g(x) .


=>` f(x) = g(x)`


=> `sqrt(r^2-x^2) =0`


=>` (r^2-x^2) =0`


=> `x^2 = r^2`


=> `x=+-r` --------(1)


so the curves `f(x)>=g(x) , -r<=x<=r`


so the area `= int _-r ^r [sqrt(r^2 - x^2) -0]dx`


let `x=rsin(theta)` ------(2)


so , `dx = rcos(theta) d theta`


but from (1) and (2) we get


`x=+-r , x= rsin(theta)` 


So,


`sin(theta) = +-1`


=> `theta = sin^(-1) (+-1)`


so` theta = +-(pi/2)`


so, now with the new integrals we get


area` = int _-r ^r [sqrt(r^2 - x^2) -0] dx`


  = `int_(-pi/2) ^(pi/2) sqrt(r^2 - r^2sin^2 (theta)) rcos(theta) d theta`


  = `int_(-pi/2) ^(pi/2) sqrt(r^2(1 - sin^2 (theta))) rcos(theta) d theta` 


  =`int_(-pi/2) ^(pi/2) sqrt(r^2( cos^2 (theta))) rcos(theta) d theta`


  =`int_(-pi/2) ^(pi/2) (rcos (theta)) rcos(theta) d theta`


  =`int_(-pi/2) ^(pi/2) (rcos (theta))^2 d(theta)`


  =`(r^2)int_(-pi/2) ^(pi/2) (cos^2 (theta)) d(theta)`


we can right the above integral as


  =`(2) (r^2)int_0 ^(pi/2) (cos^2 (theta)) d(theta)`


  as we know that `int cos^2(x) dx = (1/2)(x+(1/2)sin (2x))`


now ,


area = `(2) (r^2)int_0 ^(pi/2) (cos^2 (theta)) d(theta)`


=`(2) (r^2) [(1/2)(x+(1/2)sin (2x))]_0 ^(pi/2)`


 = `2(r^2)[((1/2)((pi/2)+(1/2)sin (2(pi/2))))-(1/2)((0)+(1/2)sin (2(0)))]`


=`2(r^2)[((1/2)((pi/2)+(0)))-0]`


=`2 r^2[pi/4]`


=` (pi r^2)/2`


Now the centroid of the region bounded by the curves is given as 


let `(x_1,y_1)` be the coordinates of the centroid so ,


`x_1` is given as


`x_1 = (1/(area)) int _a^b x[f(x)-g(x)] dx`


  where the `a= -r , b= r`


  = `(1/((pi r^2)/2)) int _-r ^r x[sqrt(r^2 -x^2)-(0)] dx`


  =`(1/((pi r^2)/2)) int _-r ^r x[sqrt(r^2 -x^2)] dx`


  =` (2/(pi r^2)) int _-r ^r [sqrt(r^2 -x^2)] xdx`


let` u = r^2 -x^2 => du = -2x dx`


`(-1/2)du = xdx`


So the bounds of integration are from `u=0` to `u=0` (plug in `x=-r` and `x=r` to `u=r^2-x^2` ) 


= `(2/(pi r^2)) int _-r ^r [sqrt(r^2 -x^2)] xdx`


= `(2/(pi r^2)) int _0 ^0 [sqrt(u)] (-1/2)du`


= `0` as `int_a^b f(t) dt = F(a) - F(b)` where F(x) is the antiderivative of f. So, `int_0^0 f(t) dt = F(0)-F(0)=0`


so, `x_1 = 0`


and now let us `y_1` and so ,


`y_1` is given as


`y_1 = (1/(area)) int _a^b (1/2) [f^2(x)-g^2(x)] dx`


    where `a= -r , b= r`


= `(1/((pi r^2)/2)) int _-r ^r (1/2)[(sqrt(r^2 -x^2))^2] dx`


= `(2/((pi r^2))) (1/2) int _-r ^r [(sqrt(r^2 -x^2))^2] dx`


 = `(1/((pi r^2))) int _-r ^r [((r^2 -x^2))] dx`


Because `r^2-x^2` is an even function with respect to x, we can change the integral limits to


 =`(2/((pi r^2))) int _0 ^r [((r^2 -x^2))] dx`


 = `(2/((pi r^2))) ((r^2)x -x^3 /3)_0 ^r `


 =` (2/((pi r^2))) [ [(r^3 -r^3 /3)]-[((r^2)0 -0^3 /3)]]`


= `2/(pi r^2) [(r^3 -r^3 /3)-0]`


= `(4r)/(3pi)`



Therefore, the centroid coordinates are `(0,(4r)/(3pi))`

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.