Skip to main content

When does Bob realize that the man to whom he is talking is not Jimmy Wells, and how does he react in "After Twenty Years"?

Bob realizes that the man with whom he talks is not Jimmy Wells after they walk under the brilliant electric lights of a drug store. He is startled that this man is a stranger, and he exclaims, "You're not Jimmy Wells!" Bob then points to the man's differences from his old friend.


In what once was the doorway of his and Jimmy's favorite restaurant, "Silky Bob" has waited twenty minutes for his old friend after having spoken to the beat patrolman. Then, he sees a man with his coat collar turned up approaching him. "Is that you, Bob?" the man asks. "Is that you, Jimmy Wells?" calls out Bob. After asking how the other is, Bob accompanies the taller man toward a place that is known to Jimmy; as they walk along arm-in-arm, Bob relates "the history of his success." But, when the bright lights of a drug store strike Jimmy's face, Bob suddenly stops, realizing he has been tricked.



"Twenty years is a long time, but not long enough to change a man's nose from a Roman to a pug."
"It sometimes changes a good man into a bad one," said the tall man. "You've been under arrest for ten minutes, 'Silky Bob.' Chicago thinks you may have dropped over our way and wires us she wants to have a chat with you."



The plainclothes policeman informs Bob that Patrolman Wells has asked him to give Bob a note; also, he tells Bob that before they go to the police station, he may read the note under the bright lights. Bob's hands shake as he reads this message from his old friend, who could not make the arrest of "Silky Bob" at the time that he talked with him in the doorway.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.