Skip to main content

When does Bob realize that the man to whom he is talking is not Jimmy Wells, and how does he react in "After Twenty Years"?

Bob realizes that the man with whom he talks is not Jimmy Wells after they walk under the brilliant electric lights of a drug store. He is startled that this man is a stranger, and he exclaims, "You're not Jimmy Wells!" Bob then points to the man's differences from his old friend.


In what once was the doorway of his and Jimmy's favorite restaurant, "Silky Bob" has waited twenty minutes for his old friend after having spoken to the beat patrolman. Then, he sees a man with his coat collar turned up approaching him. "Is that you, Bob?" the man asks. "Is that you, Jimmy Wells?" calls out Bob. After asking how the other is, Bob accompanies the taller man toward a place that is known to Jimmy; as they walk along arm-in-arm, Bob relates "the history of his success." But, when the bright lights of a drug store strike Jimmy's face, Bob suddenly stops, realizing he has been tricked.



"Twenty years is a long time, but not long enough to change a man's nose from a Roman to a pug."
"It sometimes changes a good man into a bad one," said the tall man. "You've been under arrest for ten minutes, 'Silky Bob.' Chicago thinks you may have dropped over our way and wires us she wants to have a chat with you."



The plainclothes policeman informs Bob that Patrolman Wells has asked him to give Bob a note; also, he tells Bob that before they go to the police station, he may read the note under the bright lights. Bob's hands shake as he reads this message from his old friend, who could not make the arrest of "Silky Bob" at the time that he talked with him in the doorway.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...