Skip to main content

In To Kill a Mockingbird, what is Boo Radley's role throughout the novel?

Throughout the novel, the character of Arthur "Boo" Radley is a shy citizen of Maycomb, Alabama who is unfairly discriminated against because of his taboo reclusiveness. Many rumors surround Boo Radley and children throughout Maycomb fear him. He is also the object of Jem, Dill, and Scout's fascination. As the novel progresses, Boo attempts to develop a friendship with the Jem and Scout by leaving them gifts in the knothole of his tree. At the end of the novel, Boo saves Jem and Scout's lives by wrestling Bob Ewell away from them during Bob's vicious attack. Scout finally meets Boo face to face following Bob's attack and realizes that Boo is actually a compassionate, shy individual.


Boo's character serves several functions throughout the novel. Boo is identified as an innocent being who is treated unfairly by his family and the citizens of Maycomb. Atticus' metaphor of not killing mockingbirds applies to Boo Radley's character because Boo is represented as a symbolic mockingbird. Percieving Boo as a kind, bashful individual, instead of a "malevolent phantom" is also an important breakthrough in Scout's moral development and maturation. Scout's ability to view Boo Radley as a caring neighbor is a significant moment in the novel.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.