Skip to main content

How does the author's use of figurative language characterize the house? From "There Will Come Soft Rains" by Ray Bradbury.

In this story, Bradbury shows the dangerous side of technology. In this scenario of the future, people have let technology dominate their lives. As a result, they developed technological weapons capable of destroying civilization. The house is automated and self-sufficient. It's as if the house is an individual taking care of, and controlling, the family that lives (lived) there. As such, the house is personified by the author.


In the first line, the voice of the house sings "as if it were afraid" when it is time to wake up the family:



In the living room the voice-clock sang, Tick-tock, seven o'clock, time to get up, time to get up, seven o'clock! as if it were afraid that nobody would.



Before the nuclear war, the house had been very efficient. "Until this day, how well the house had kept its peace. How carefully it had inquired, "Who goes there? What's the password?" The house answers the door just like a person would. The narrator later adds that the house begins to die at ten o'clock. This is another example of personification or anthropomorphization. The house is not described like a machine breaking down. It is dying. The narrator adds, "The house tried to save itself." Once again, the author shows how the house was almost sentient. That is, the house was like a conscious being.


Bradbury is stressing the message that when technology becomes too powerful and controls too much of our lives, devastating things can happen. The house is a technological device that dictated the family's life.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...