Skip to main content

In Bartleby the Scrivener by Herman Melville, what part do the setting and the subtitle ("A Story of Wall Street") play in the story? Why does the...

The subtitle, “A Story of Wall Street,” appears to refer to the famous street in Manhattan, and would seem to support a particular reading of the story, in which Bartleby can be seen as an exploited worker, worn down by long service to the “machine” of capitalism. While this may be true, it’s not the only (or best) reading of the story. As you point out, the story is full of references to walls, screens, and blank views. The lawyer is at great pains to position Bartleby behind a screen; Bartleby’s window looks out only onto another wall; in fact, the whole architecture of the office seems designed to box Bartleby in and conceal him from view. Bartleby is as “blank” himself as the view out his window – the lawyer is never able to learn much about who he is or where he comes from. As the lawyer discovers when he finds that Bartleby has been living in the office, and persists there even after he relocates his office to another building, Bartleby has become part of the architecture, a kind of “ghost in the machine,” a mute symbol of whatever essential yet elusive thing the lawyer feels he lacks – commonality, friendship, love, or perhaps simply the need for an object on which he can bestow his generosity. Whatever it is the lawyer wants, his desires are always blocked by Bartleby, who can always be counted on to “prefer not to.” In this sense, we can understand the “Wall Street” of the subtitle to refer to a place full of obstacles and impediments, an endless series of walls between us readers and the human connection we all desire.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more