Skip to main content

In Bartleby the Scrivener by Herman Melville, what part do the setting and the subtitle ("A Story of Wall Street") play in the story? Why does the...

The subtitle, “A Story of Wall Street,” appears to refer to the famous street in Manhattan, and would seem to support a particular reading of the story, in which Bartleby can be seen as an exploited worker, worn down by long service to the “machine” of capitalism. While this may be true, it’s not the only (or best) reading of the story. As you point out, the story is full of references to walls, screens, and blank views. The lawyer is at great pains to position Bartleby behind a screen; Bartleby’s window looks out only onto another wall; in fact, the whole architecture of the office seems designed to box Bartleby in and conceal him from view. Bartleby is as “blank” himself as the view out his window – the lawyer is never able to learn much about who he is or where he comes from. As the lawyer discovers when he finds that Bartleby has been living in the office, and persists there even after he relocates his office to another building, Bartleby has become part of the architecture, a kind of “ghost in the machine,” a mute symbol of whatever essential yet elusive thing the lawyer feels he lacks – commonality, friendship, love, or perhaps simply the need for an object on which he can bestow his generosity. Whatever it is the lawyer wants, his desires are always blocked by Bartleby, who can always be counted on to “prefer not to.” In this sense, we can understand the “Wall Street” of the subtitle to refer to a place full of obstacles and impediments, an endless series of walls between us readers and the human connection we all desire.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.