Skip to main content

In Animal Farm, how do the owners of Foxwood and Pinchfield react after the rebellion?

It must be noted, firstly, that Frederick of Pinchfield farm and Pilkington of Foxwood, were sworn enemies and could not tolerate one another. They both had, however, a similar response to the Rebellion. Both were 'thoroughly frightened' by what had happened on Manor farm and wanted to prevent a similar event from happening on their farms at all costs. They initially mocked the idea of animals running a farm all by themselves and said that the whole thing would be over within a couple of weeks. 


They proceeded to spread vicious rumors about the farm, which they insisted on calling 'Manor Farm' instead of its new title, 'Animal Farm.' The two, for example, said that the animals were continuously fighting with each other and were also quickly dying of hunger. After some time, when it became clear that the animals were healthy and not starving, they changed their tune and started saying that there was a pervasive evil on the farm.


The two farmers gossiped that the animals were eating each other and that they were practicing torture by using red hot horseshoes. They also claimed that the male animals were sharing their females. Both of them agreed that the evil on Animal Farm was because the animals had acted against the laws of Nature. 


Although the two men did not specifically mention exactly which natural laws the animals had broken, it is easy to deduce that they were referring to the so-called laws of natural order in which man occupies the top position and all animals are subject to his rule. The animals, by taking over the farm, had overturned the status quo and upset the balance in nature. As far as the two farmers were concerned, this was an abomination and the animals deserved whatever punishment they got.


It was for this reason, more than anything else, that Pilkington and Frederick's men later decided to assist Jones and his men in an attempt to retake the farm. They failed miserably and were driven off the farm, hurt and humiliated.


Public opinion about the farm generally remained the same and every human wanted it to fail. The animals, however, gained their respect, albeit against their will, because of the efficient manner in which they managed the farm. As the text explains in chapter 6:



One symptom of this was that they had begun to call Animal Farm by its proper name and ceased to pretend that it was called the Manor Farm. They had also dropped their championship of Jones, who had given up hope of getting his farm back and gone to live in another part of the county.



Eventually, Napoleon, through a solicitor, Mr Whymper, considered entering into business dealings with the very same individuals who had been so critical at the beginning, who were more than willing to benefit.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...