Skip to main content

How is Gordimer’s inclusion of the description of the miners also an explanation of why people are afraid in South African society?

This story was published in 1989, in the waning years of the apartheid in South Africa. The apartheid was a system of racial segregation in South Africa which lasted from 1948 to 1994. During this time, a white minority controlled and oppressed the country of a black majority. In these waning years, crime and protests were common. In this story, Gordimer (a white South African) reflects fears of crime and violence which many people had under this system and as it headed towards transition.


She awakens to a mysterious sound and fears an intruder is in her house or trying to get in. This fear she illustrates alludes to the uncertain future which South Africa would have after the apartheid would be abolished. However, she comes to her senses and realizes that the noise is simply a creaky house which had been built upon an underground mine. So, the inclusion of the miners actually suggests a moment of logic, reason, and maybe even hope. Realizing her fear was misplaced, Gordimer indirectly suggests that any racial fear of "the other" is likewise misplaced. This is only one interpretation. But, in any case, her realization about the mine under her house dispels her fear of an intruder. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.