Skip to main content

In Hamlet, why is the ghost dressed in armor?

Though the armor worn by King Hamlet's ghost is a small detail, it actually serves an important role in the play. First of all, the armor worn by King Hamlet's ghost signifies that the ghost is on a mission dealing with martial conflict and war; since the ghost essentially wants Hamlet to combat injustice and wrestle the kingdom of Denmark out of Claudius' clutches, this martial theme makes sense. Secondly, the armor is actually important for the practical purpose of identifying the ghost as King Hamlet. For instance, take a look at this exchange between Marcellus and Horatio after they see the ghost in Act 1, Scene 1:



MARCELLUS: Is it not like the King?


ORATIO: As thou art to thyself.
Such was the very armour he had on
When he the ambitious Norway combated. (71-4)



From this exchange, we learn that the ghost is indeed the ghost of King Hamlet, as the apparition is wearing the former king's armor. By dressing his specter in armor, Shakespeare immediately tells the audience that King Hamlet has died and is haunting Elsinore. As such, the ghost in Hamlet wears armor not only to signify his warlike mission, but also to signify that he is the ghost of the former king. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more