Skip to main content

In the short story "The Pedestrian" when the author says the television touched the faces of the people but never really touched them. What does he...


The tombs, ill-lit by television light, where the people sat like the dead, the gray or multicolored lights touching their faces, but never really touching them.



The touching part is fairly straightforward.  A television that is on in a dark room is the only luminous object in the room.  That means it produces light.  The light will travel away from the television at 300,000,000 m/s and hit any opaque object that is in the way.  A person's face is an opaque object that is in the way, so the light will be touching the person.  


Light is not made of matter, so technically it can't touch anything.  Bradbury is a science guy, so he knows this, but that is not what he means.  What the quote is trying to convey is the fact that the things that the people are watching on television are ultimately empty and meaningless.  Most likely, the people are watching fictional stories about fictional people.  It's entertaining, but meaningless, because no matter what happens on the TV screen, it doesn't affect people and events in "real life."  Either that, or the people are in such a trance-like state that they are no longer "touched" or moved by anything that they see on television anymore.  They have become immune and desensitized.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.