Skip to main content

How many galaxies are there in the universe?

First, we do not know precisely how many galaxies there are in the universe. There are several reasons why a precise count cannot exist with current technology and funding. Our way to determine the number of galaxies involves not just scanning of a specific region in the sky, but careful analysis to determine if what appears as a minuscule and faint dot of light is or is not a galaxy. That involves careful analysis of its spectrum of electromagnetic radiation, first to see if it has a typical spectrum of a single star or a galaxy, containing many stars, and second, to examine red shift to determine its distance and age. From several observations of specific patches of sky, astronomers extrapolate general figures. 


In many regions of the sky, small galaxies may be too faint to be seen or our views of them may be blocked by other objects. This means that astronomers need to make approximations based on what can be observed and intricate mathematical models which create estimates based on the observable number of galaxies in selected quadrants and estimates of the total mass of the universe based on other factors such as its speed of expansion. There is also a problem of definition of what constitutes a galaxy versus a proto-galaxy, quasar, or Seyfert galaxy. 


A rough current estimate is 200 billion galaxies, but that estimate is constantly being refined and revised. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more