Skip to main content

In Of Mice and Men by John Steinbeck, how does Crooks feel about Lennie’s intrusion?

In Chapter Four of Steinbeck's Of Mice and Men, George has gone into town on Saturday night along with some of the other ranch hands, leaving Lennie behind. While in the barn playing with his puppy he sees the light from Crooks's room. Crooks is the black stable buck who tends the horses and mules on the ranch. Because he is black, Crooks is segregated from the other men and has his own room. In the beginning of the chapter, Steinbeck describes the room, noting several of the objects, including books, medicine bottles and the implements of Crooks's work. When Lennie appears in the doorway, Crooks is defensive and tells Lennie to go away:






Crooks said sharply, “You got no right to come in my room. This here’s my room. Nobody got any right in here but me.” 









Lennie, however, in his innocent and friendly way, stays in the doorway and repeats that he had seen Crooks's light. Crooks explains to Lennie that he doesn't want Lennie in his room because the men never let him into the bunkhouse to play cards or for conversation. When Lennie questions this, Crooks says,






“’Cause I’m black. They play cards in there, but I can’t play because I’m black. They say I stink. Well, I tell you, you all of you stink to me.” 









Eventually Crooks gives in and allows Lennie into his room. Steinbeck suggests that Crooks was happy to have the company:






Crooks scowled, but Lennie’s disarming smile defeated him. “Come on in and set a while,” Crooks said. “’Long as you won’t get out and leave me alone, you might as well set down.” His tone was a little more friendly. “All the boys gone into town, huh?” 









In the next part of the chapter, Crooks reveals his intense loneliness to Lennie as he talks about his childhood and how difficult it is to live by himself and not have anyone to talk to. 










Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.