Skip to main content

In Of Mice and Men by John Steinbeck, how does Crooks feel about Lennie’s intrusion?

In Chapter Four of Steinbeck's Of Mice and Men, George has gone into town on Saturday night along with some of the other ranch hands, leaving Lennie behind. While in the barn playing with his puppy he sees the light from Crooks's room. Crooks is the black stable buck who tends the horses and mules on the ranch. Because he is black, Crooks is segregated from the other men and has his own room. In the beginning of the chapter, Steinbeck describes the room, noting several of the objects, including books, medicine bottles and the implements of Crooks's work. When Lennie appears in the doorway, Crooks is defensive and tells Lennie to go away:






Crooks said sharply, “You got no right to come in my room. This here’s my room. Nobody got any right in here but me.” 









Lennie, however, in his innocent and friendly way, stays in the doorway and repeats that he had seen Crooks's light. Crooks explains to Lennie that he doesn't want Lennie in his room because the men never let him into the bunkhouse to play cards or for conversation. When Lennie questions this, Crooks says,






“’Cause I’m black. They play cards in there, but I can’t play because I’m black. They say I stink. Well, I tell you, you all of you stink to me.” 









Eventually Crooks gives in and allows Lennie into his room. Steinbeck suggests that Crooks was happy to have the company:






Crooks scowled, but Lennie’s disarming smile defeated him. “Come on in and set a while,” Crooks said. “’Long as you won’t get out and leave me alone, you might as well set down.” His tone was a little more friendly. “All the boys gone into town, huh?” 









In the next part of the chapter, Crooks reveals his intense loneliness to Lennie as he talks about his childhood and how difficult it is to live by himself and not have anyone to talk to. 










Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...