Skip to main content

A canoe has a velocity of 0.460 m/s southeast relative to the earth. The canoe is on a river that is flowing at 0.600 m/s east relative to the...

Set up a vector diagram to calculate the velocity of the canoe relative to the river. 


To do this use the relative motion formula.


`V_(ac)=V_(ab)+V_(bc)`


Put into words, the velocity of a with respect to c is equal to the velocity of a with respect to b plus the velocity of b with respect to b.


You will find:


`V_(canoe,river)+V_(river,earth)=V_(canoe,earth)`


Where we dont know `V_(canoe,river)`


We have 2 lengths of the triangle, and the angle between those 2 lengths. For simplicity, lets now call the lengths we do know b and c and the angle between them A. 


The length opposite the angle A is what we require as this is the magnitude of the velocity of the canoe (namely, its speed) relative to the river.


We can calculate the length a using the Cosine Rule:


a^2 = b^2 + c^2 - (2bc cosA)


Giving


a = sqrt (b^2 + c^2 - 2bc cos A)


Now, we have that the lengths b and c are 


b = 0.460 m/s


c = 0.600 m/s


and that the angle A = 45 degrees = pi/4 radians


Finally then we have


a = sqrt ( 0.46^2 + 0.6^2 - (0.46)(0.6)cos (pi/4))


= sqrt ( 0.5716 - 0.276/sqrt(2))


= sqrt (0.3764) = 0.6135 m/s


The magnitude of the canoe relative to the river is 0.614 m/s. However this is westwards on the East/West axis, so that the canoe is drifting southwards and in the opposite direction to the river on the East/West axis relative to the river. You can tell this from your vector diagram. The precise angle of relative drift can be calculated with the Sine Rule or Cosine Rule.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.