Skip to main content

How does Holden use the term "yellow" in chapters 7–13? Is he "yellow"? What evidence supports this?

Holden's discussion of "yellow" -- and the two best examples of it -- occur in Chapter 13.  


Yellow means cowardly.  It is similar to the term "chicken."  Holden only uses it in connection with the example he gives about how he would handle it if, hypothetically, he had found out which student stole his gloves at Pence.  He imagines himself going to the thief's room, finding the gloves in the thief's galoshes, and confronting the thief verbally.  "Okay, how about handing over those gloves?"  He then imagines evading the question "Are you calling me a crook?" with "All I know is my gloves were in your goddam galoshes."  He would do this again and again rather than start the fight he'd like to start.  He could not bring himself to say, "Yes, I am calling you a thief," or to confront the thief more directly than with a cutting, sarcastic comment.  He imagines that he would stand there, frozen, for about five minutes, unable to get up the nerve to "sock the guy in the jaw." 


Avoiding a direct confrontation is certainly a form of cowardice.  So yes, Holden is a bit "yellow" in this imagined scene.  Throughout the rest of the book, we see that Holden does not avoid confrontation, but he confronts indirectly.  His tendency is to keep prodding or provoking another person, ignoring social signals, until they snap.  For example, he keeps provoking Stradlater about whether he had sex with Jane, until Stradlater beats him up. Apparently Holden feels it would be better if he were more direct (although this might mean that he would go around punching people.) 


Later in Chapter 13, we see Holden chicken out of having sex with a prostitute who comes to his room.  On the face of it, this might look like cowardice.  But it is not.  It is really sensitivity and compassion.  Holden can't bring himself to treat the girl in a dehumanizing way.  He is unnerved when she simply pulls off her dress, wanting to have a conversation with her first.  He is also depressed by the thought of her life being what it is.  Finally, he can't go through with it, and sends her away, but although embarrassing, this is really to his credit. True to form, he does not tell her directly why he has lost interest.  Instead he makes up a ridiculous lie about having had a recent operation. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.