Skip to main content

What are three ways consumers can benefit from monopolies?

Often, people only focus on the negative impacts of monopolies. One of the most basic benefits of a monopoly is that companies with monopolies can use economies of scale. They can buy, produce, and distribute in bulk. That can result in both cheaper prices and faster distribution of goods. Both of these benefit consumers directly. Monopolies are also stable, and that benefits consumers. You might like them or dislike them, but they are known quantities. That means a kind of continuity and shared reference. Microsoft isn't a complete monopoly, but it is close enough to one that businesses can assume new employees know Microsoft programs like Word. That benefits both businesses (less training is needed, and it is easier to evaluate applicants) and consumers. Finally, monopolies can be more efficient.


Monopolies also tend to have more money to dedicate to research. That does not benefit consumers directly, but it does benefit them a great deal indirectly. More research means product improvements (at least eventually), and that benefits consumers.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.