Skip to main content

How can you tell the differences between reliable and unreliable health information, products and services?

The best way to protect yourself from health scams and frauds is to know how to find reliable sources of information so that you can research individual products and services and get unbiased information.


In general, websites run by government agencies, reputable non-profit organizations, hospitals and universities are good sources of information while commercial sites that are trying to sell you their products are not reliable. Some of the best websites for finding reliable information include:


  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: http://www.cdc.gov/

  • Mayo Clinic: http://www.mayoclinic.org/

  • American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons: http://www.orthoinfo.org/

  • American Heart Association: http://www.heart.org/HEARTORG/

  • Columbia University Go Ask Alice: http://www.goaskalice.columbia.edu/

In the United States, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has responsibility for monitoring health claims for products and services. It helps consumers find reliable information and products several ways:


  • Consumer Videos: The FDA has produced several short informative videos you can watch about how to detect health frauds. 

  • Website: You can look up individual products on the FDA website to see if they have been approved or flagged for violations.

  • Regulations: The FDA tests and regulates products sold in the US to ensure safety and efficacy.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.