Skip to main content

In "Dusk" by Saki, why do you think that the young man's look of disarming frankness puts Gortsby on his guard?

It is evident from the description of Gortsby's observations and reflections that he makes a habit of sitting on a bench in this general area around dusk, probably shortly after he gets off work in some office, and watches the passing crowd. This would inevitably mean that he would be approached by strangers with hard-luck stories. Gortsby considers himself sophisticated. No doubt he has given people money in the past and then had second thoughts about it. He has obviously developed a cynical attitude about humanity in general as a means of self-defense. When a man sits down beside him on his bench--especially when there are probably vacant benches all around at that late hour--he is immediately suspicious. He is familiar with the stranger's opening ploy.



As if to emphasise the fact that the world went badly with him the new-corner unburdened himself of an angry and very audible expletive as he flung himself into the seat.



Gortsby understands that this "audible expletive" is intended to get him to ask what is the matter. He does as expected because he is amused. Whatever the young man is going to ask him for, the answer will be no. Gortsby is doubly suspicious and defensive with the young man's response to his question:



The young man turned to him with a look of disarming frankness which put him instantly on his guard.



Gortsby has seen that well-rehearsed "look of disarming frankness" before. It is always the prelude to a hard-luck story. It is an act that naturally seems to go with hard-luck stories. It might be effective with some people who have never heard such stories or seen such looks--but part of the price that Gortsby has to pay for sitting on a bench in this park at dusk is being a target for panhandlers and con-men of all denominations, from those who are only asking for a penny to those who are after as much as a pound. Gortsby has hardened his heart as a result of experience. 


Since Gortsby is suspicious of this young stranger from the beginning, he is listening critically and detects the one flaw in the otherwise clever story. 



"Of course," said Gortsby slowly, "the weak point of your story is that you can't produce the soap."



This con-man seems like a novice. He is stuck with claiming that he not only lost his hotel but that he lost the cake of soap he went out to buy with only a shilling in his pocket.  The con-man is angered--not because he was exposed, but because he has invested a certain amount of valuable time unproductively. It will be dark soon, and he will have a very short time left in which to find another "mark" to listen to his story. The fact that it is dusk means that people will be getting up and going home soon. 


The con-man's story was fashioned to give Gortsby the impression that he was being given a golden opportunity to make the acquaintance of a young country gentleman who might offer him opportunities to rise in the world. The stranger makes it clear that he is all alone in London. No doubt he would be happy to know a long-time resident his own age who could show him around town. The con-man's story contains several "hooks," one of which is:



There's a nice predicament for a fellow who hasn't any friends or connections in London! 



Gortsby, the cynic, is hooked by the prospect of gaining something for himself by making what is only a short-term loan of a sovereign. He can hardly doubt that this young aristocrat, who talks as if he has been to Eton and Oxford, would fail to repay the loan. But Gortsby will find out that he has been tricked again. And he may become even more cynical and hard-hearted as a result.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...
Post a Comment
Read more