Skip to main content

What does Hammurabi’s Code reveal about societal values and realities?

Firstly, Hammurabi’s Code demonstrates the idea of justice based on retaliation in an early civilization, as can be found in provisions analogous to the famous saying, "an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth." Offenders of physical harm are punished in exactly the same way the victims are harmed by them, given that they are of the same class.


Secondly, the Code reveals the class distinction of the ancient Babylonian society. It divides the population into three classes: property owners, freed men, and slaves, and provides for varied punishments for the same crimes based on the class of the victims and the perpetrators. Those belonging to the lower classes receive much more severe punishments for doing the same wrongs and get less compensation for suffering from the same damage as those belonging to the upper classes.


Thirdly, it is evidence of the patriarchal nature of the society. Although the laws attempt to grant some protection to women and children from patriarchal abuse, men are entitled to more rights than women and are permitted to sell their wives and kids into slavery under certain circumstances, such as to pay off debts.


Last but not least, the Code embodies the absolute power possessed by the top ruler of ancient Babylon. Made and enacted by Hammurabi, the Code is in effect a representation of the king’s own judicial beliefs rather than the general public’s.  Although many rules may seem unfair from a modern perspective, Hammurabi’s Code served to maintain the social order and reinforced the king’s reign, as well as provided inspiration for many later rule-makers.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.