Skip to main content

In Tangerine, what does Paul's mom say about the house she grew up in?

Although Paul's mom says almost nothing, directly, about the house she grew up in, her comments in the chapter titled "Thursday, August 31" strongly imply that she grew up in a very small and/or very run-down house in a poor neighborhood:



Mom suddenly got very serious. "Paul, I'm talking as somebody who never, ever lived in a nice house growing up. Or even lived anywhere near a nice house. This is not a joke to me. Your house is your family's biggest investment. And you have to protect that investment."



The home that the Fisher family has moved into in Tangerine is clearly very nice, representing the upper middle-class lifestyle that the family enjoys. There's a guardhouse at the front of the neighborhood, everything is newly built, and each of the boys gets his own room in the house.


By contrast, Paul's mom was definitely not raised in such luxury when she was a child. This comes up in the novel because Paul finds it strange that his mom is so worried about the smell of the muck fires near their home, as well as the uniformity of the mailboxes all along their street. Paul sees no reason to care much about these things. But his mother understands that it's details like these that can lower the property value of a home. She treats the situation with such seriousness because, more so than her sons, she understands the need to ensure that the family's investment in the house remains a smart one.


Why is this important to consider? It tells us a lot about Mrs. Fisher as a character in this story. She's serious, shrewd, and proactive about maintaining the stability of her relatively luxurious life.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.