Skip to main content

Is it probable that cyanobacteria were the first organisms to photosynthesize?

That depends on what mean by "cyanobacteria," and what kind of photosynthesis you have in mind. 


Photosynthesis is the conversion of light energy into chemical energy that an organism can use as fuel. There are two different kinds of photosynthesis -- oxygenic and anoxygenic. Oxygenic photosynthesis releases oxygen as a byproduct; anoxygenic photosynthesis does not.


There is widespread agreement among biologists that cyanobacteria were the first organisms to engage in oxygenic photosynthesis. However, the first photosynthesizing organisms ("phototrophs") may have been the ancestors of cyanobacteria.


Although biologists are still attempting to reconstruct this evolutionary history, the emerging consensus is that anoxygenic photosynthesis evolved first. In 2006, Armen Mulkidjanian and his colleagues conducted a genetic study of extant photosynthesizing bacteria species in order to reconstruct the likely evolution of photosynthesis. Their results led them to argue that the first photosynthesizing organisms were anoxygenic ancestors of cyanobacteria (see pnas.org link below). Later, these ancestral, photosynthesizing organisms gave rise to oxygenic cyanobacteria.


These events are thought to have taken place between about 3.5 and 2.5 billion years ago. After the emergence of oxygen-producing cyanobacteria, huge volumes of oxygen were pumped into the earth's atmosphere for the first time.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more