A tesseract is a wrinkle in space and time that allows the Murry children, like their father before them, to leap over great distances in the space-time continuum. As Mrs. Whatsit explains it, if you wrinkle up the cloth of a skirt, an ant can travel across it much faster. Likewise, by using wrinkles in time, Mrs. Whatsit, Who and Which can almost instantly arrive at other planets. Tessering, or using a tesseract, allowed Mr. Murry to get quickly to the planet Camazotz, and it allows Meg, Charles Wallace and Calvin to follow him there and save him from the power of IT. It also allows all of them to return to earth in the blink of an eye. This fortunate feature makes space travel possible for humans.
As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Comments
Post a Comment