Skip to main content

Can someone analyze the costs and consequences of the Civil War for the United States?

The Civil War was a very costly war and had significant consequences. The greatest sacrifice was in terms of the lives that were lost. About 620,000 Americans died in the Civil War. The total amount of money spent was about $2.3 billion. Much of the South was destroyed, and it would take years to rebuild the South.


There were important consequences as a result of the Civil War. Slavery ended as a result of the Civil War. It also became clear that the federal government came first while the state governments came second. The Civil War showed Americans that there had to be a better way to resolve our disputes than to fight each other. The enormous cost of the Civil War made this point very clear. As a result of the Civil War, the South had to be rebuilt. This gave us an opportunity to create a society that was better than what we had before the Civil War began. While conditions improved for a while in the South for African-Americans, eventually some of the lessons from the war were lost as conditions in the South became very similar to those that existed in the South before the Civil War began once Reconstruction ended.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more