Skip to main content

grammar - Since when a double negative as an intensifier was considered as non-standard and why?


In present-day English, a double negative as an intensifier is regarded as non-standard. For example I don't think that "I can't get no satisfaction" is considered as standard English. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HoxRFOr_sQ0


However, here's from Hamlet Act 1, Scene 2.



O, most wicked speed, to post


With such dexterity to incestuous sheets!


It is not, nor it cannot come to good;


But break my heart,--for I must hold my tongue!



Notice that "nor it cannot come to good" is a double negative. And Hamlet is the Prince of Denmark who is supposed to be well-educated.


Here's from the Abbot's:



Many irregularities may be explained by the desire of emphasis which suggests repetition, even where repetition, as in the case of a negative, neutralizes the original phrase: ... This idiom is a very natural one, and quite common in E.E. (E. A. Abbott, A Shakespearean Grammar, Item 406, p.295) https://archive.org/details/shakespeariangra034962mbp



So here's my question.



Since when a double negative as an intensifier was considered as non-standard and why?





Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more