Skip to main content

Can you please help me with this problem about thermal equilibrium?

It is a common experience that when we pour hot tea in a mug, the mug gets warm and we have to hold it using its handle. This is simply because heat from the tea has been transferred to the mug. Similarly, over the course of the next few minutes, the tea and the mug get cold. This happens because the mug and the tea lose heat to the colder surroundings. 


This shows that heat flows from a region of higher temperature to a region of lower temperature. This rule always holds true. In the present case, the plastic cup is at 70 degrees F while the water is at 40 degrees F. The heat will flow from the hotter substance to the colder substance, which means it will flow from the plastic cup to the water (in this case). The heat transfer would be faster initially, since the temperature difference is higher between the two regions. Over time, as the water's temperature goes up and that of the cup goes down, heat transfer will slow down. In the end, both the objects will come to the same temperature. That is, the water and the cup will be in thermal equilibrium.


Among the given options, choice C is correct.


Hope this helps. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more