Skip to main content

What did Balthazar and Abram do during the fight in Act 1, Scene 1?

Abraham and Balthasar start a fight with Sampson and Gregory as part of the Montague-Capulet Feud.


Sampson and Gregory represent the House of Capulet, and Abraham and Balthasar represent the House of Montague.  The two families are in a feud that affects everyone even remotely related to them.  For this reason, apparently you can’t even walk on the street in Verona without a brawl starting.


Abraham and Balthasar’s brawl starts pretty innocently.   They are walking along in the street (with swords, of course), when Sampson insults them.  He does so slyly and silently, with what would be the equivalent of the modern middle finger.  Abraham calls him out on it.



Enter ABRAHAM and BALTHASAR


ABRAHAM


Do you bite your thumb at us, sir?


SAMPSON


I do bite my thumb, sir.


ABRAHAM


Do you bite your thumb at us, sir?


SAMPSON


[Aside to GREGORY] Is the law of our side, if I say
ay?


GREGORY


No. (Act 1, Scene 1) 



Balthasar doesn’t say anything, but he seems to engage in the fight.  Benvolio, another Montague, comes and tries to break it up.  Then Tybalt, another Capulet, comes and joins the fight.  Soon there is an all-out brawl in the streets where anyone who sides with either family joins in.



Enter, several of both houses, who join the fray; then enter Citizens, with clubs


First Citizen


Clubs, bills, and partisans! strike! beat them down!
Down with the Capulets! down with the Montagues! No. (Act 1, Scene 1) 



The heads of the two houses arrive, and then the prince.  He declares that there has been too much fighting, and lectures the Montagues and Capulets.  He also dictates the punishment of death to anyone who fights from then on. 


This scene indicates from the beginning how serious the feud is.  Everyone walks around with swords, and they are ready to use them at a moment’s notice for the smallest insult.  In addition, there is the penalty now for fighting. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...
Post a Comment
Read more