Skip to main content

What did Balthazar and Abram do during the fight in Act 1, Scene 1?

Abraham and Balthasar start a fight with Sampson and Gregory as part of the Montague-Capulet Feud.


Sampson and Gregory represent the House of Capulet, and Abraham and Balthasar represent the House of Montague.  The two families are in a feud that affects everyone even remotely related to them.  For this reason, apparently you can’t even walk on the street in Verona without a brawl starting.


Abraham and Balthasar’s brawl starts pretty innocently.   They are walking along in the street (with swords, of course), when Sampson insults them.  He does so slyly and silently, with what would be the equivalent of the modern middle finger.  Abraham calls him out on it.



Enter ABRAHAM and BALTHASAR


ABRAHAM


Do you bite your thumb at us, sir?


SAMPSON


I do bite my thumb, sir.


ABRAHAM


Do you bite your thumb at us, sir?


SAMPSON


[Aside to GREGORY] Is the law of our side, if I say
ay?


GREGORY


No. (Act 1, Scene 1) 



Balthasar doesn’t say anything, but he seems to engage in the fight.  Benvolio, another Montague, comes and tries to break it up.  Then Tybalt, another Capulet, comes and joins the fight.  Soon there is an all-out brawl in the streets where anyone who sides with either family joins in.



Enter, several of both houses, who join the fray; then enter Citizens, with clubs


First Citizen


Clubs, bills, and partisans! strike! beat them down!
Down with the Capulets! down with the Montagues! No. (Act 1, Scene 1) 



The heads of the two houses arrive, and then the prince.  He declares that there has been too much fighting, and lectures the Montagues and Capulets.  He also dictates the punishment of death to anyone who fights from then on. 


This scene indicates from the beginning how serious the feud is.  Everyone walks around with swords, and they are ready to use them at a moment’s notice for the smallest insult.  In addition, there is the penalty now for fighting. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more