Skip to main content

How does H. A. Guerber use the literary element of characterization to develop the tyrant Dionysius' character in "Damon and Pythias?"

Throughout "Damon and Pythias," Guerber uses the literary element of characterization to paint Dionysius' development from a cruel tyrant into a redeemed leader. Dionysius' growth as a character is rooted in his interactions with Damon and Pythias. In the beginning of the story, Dionysius sentences Pythias to death because of his egoism and paranoia. He allows Pythias to return home to settle his affairs as long as he leaves Damon in his place, but the tyrant does not believe that his original prisoner will return.

As the story progresses, Dionysius comes to admire and even envy Damon's devotion to his friend. Through their interactions, it becomes clear that Dionysius is lonely and disillusioned due to his social standing. This revelation makes him a more sympathetic character and hints at the personal growth he exhibits in the final act.


At the end of the story, when Damon is moments away from being executed in Pythias' place, Dionysius is shocked to realize that Pythias honored his word and returned to face execution. Up to this point, Dionysius has projected his own moral shortcomings and selfishness on Pythias, assuming that he will abandon his friend in his own self-interest. Dionysius is so moved by the loyalty and bond shared by Pythias and Damon that he has a change of heart and pardons them both, marking his final character transformation. In Guerber's version of this classic tale, Dionysius is moved by the power and depth of their friendship and it changes his entire outlook as a leader.


Throughout "Damon and Pythias," Guerber gradually develops Dionysius as a character. He begins the story as its primary antagonist and the narrative ends with his transformation into a man who is capable of mercy and humility.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more