Skip to main content

Why is Creon not the main character in Antigone?

One of the lasting debates about Sophocles’ Antigone focuses on whether the main tragic figure in the play is Antigone or Creon. Antigone is a more sympathetic character than Creon, and she also exhibits some of the characteristics of a tragic figure—through her own pride and actions, she suffers a reversal of fortune. Further, she is the daughter of Oedipus, and the other two of Sophocles’ Theban plays focus on Oedipus and his family. This may indicate that she is the main focus of this play as it follows the theme of the tragedy of the family of Oedipus. It is also worth noting that the title Antigone was ascribed to the play be readers who found Antigone to be the main focus of the play (we do not know what title, if any, was given to the play by Sophocles).


What creates uncertainty regarding who should be considered the main tragic figure in the play is that Creon also exhibits the characteristics of a tragic figure, and some even read Creon as being the more prominent tragic figure. His fall, within the context of the play itself, is greater and more complete than Antigone’s fall, in the sense that he has to live with the deaths of his loved ones, which his actions wrought. Further, Creon comes to recognize his own fall, and the reasons for it, in a way that Antigone, who goes to death defiant and proud, does not. In this way, Creon seems to be a more likely candidate for the main tragic figure. 


However, perhaps a more complete understanding of the play is that both Antigone and Creon are tragic figures, and that neither character's role in the play is more prominent than the other character's role, at least in terms of who the main tragic figure is. So while modern readers will likely see Antigone as the main character, as she is more sympathetic and seems to fit the mold of a protagonist, and the less sympathetic Creon as the antagonist, it seems quite possible that Sophocles intended a more complex understanding of the roles of the two main characters in the play Antigone.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.