Skip to main content

Does Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone have religious undertones?

Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone has religious undertones in the Christ-like figure that Harry is made into.


The comparisons between Jesus Christ and Harry Potter begin wherein Harry is described as The Chosen One. Harry was a miraculous child that survived a vicious attack from Lord Voldemort, thus defeating the Dark Lord. In The Bible, Jesus Christ is referred to as a chosen son of God to walk the Earth in God's image. In Christianity, it is often believed that Jesus is the only way Satan will be kept at bay. Jesus is also a miracle child in that he was born to the virginal Mary.


As the story of The Sorcerer's Stone progresses, a lot of myth and wonder surrounds Harry. When he meets wizards and witches for the first time, they reach out to shake his hand and thank him for the kindness he has done in ridding the world of Lord Voldemort. Jesus Christ plays a similar role in The Bible, healing lepers and sinners alike. Men and women gather to see Jesus in real life, often asking to touch his body and thanking him for the miracles he has performed.


Lastly, Harry sacrifices himself in order to defeat Lord Voldemort at the end of the book. He is resurrected from a comatose state under Albus Dumbledore's care, a character with God-like qualities. Within Christianity, Jesus was nailed to a cross and subsequently died. Later, Jesus is resurrected by God. The celebration of Easter for Christians and the final feast at the Great Hall in Sorcerer's Stone are akin to each other in that both celebrations focus on a resurrected savior.


With these examples present, one need not look far for comparisons between Harry Potter and Jesus Christ in Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.