Skip to main content

How can I approach writing an essay about how Gloria Naylor proves in Linden Hills that success comes at the expense of humanistic values?

You have put your finger on precisely what the two main characters (Willie and Willa) learn throughout the course of the book. I would begin your introduction with that idea and filter down to a thesis: Success can be had only at the expense of moral or humanistic values as evidenced by the minor characters of Linden Hills: Mr. Tilson, Winston Alcott, Reverend Hollis, and Evelyn Creton Nedeed.


Your body paragraphs would speak of each of these minor characters from Linden Hills respectively and always begin with a topic sentence. For example, the paragraph about Mr. Tilson should show proof that his need for money drove him to work numerous jobs and caused a fatal heart attack. Life is the thing that ceases to be valued in Mr. Tilson’s case. The paragraph about Winston Alcott should explain that he has married a lady he does not love simply to achieve respectability. Love is the thing that ceases to be valued in Mr. Alcott’s case. The paragraph about the minister, Reverend Hollis, should give examples of how he is a liar and a substance abuser. Truth is the thing that ceases to be valued in Mr. Hollis’ case. Finally, the resident of Linden Hills named Evelyn Creton Nedeed has a rich yet cold husband.  In order to cope, Evelyn uses chemicals to make herself look thin and to entice her husband. Eventually she uses chemicals to kill herself. Moderation is the thing that ceases to be valued in Evelyn’s case.


For your conclusion, reword your thesis and then present a new idea. Perhaps you could make a case that the main characters (Willie and Willa) are able to think clearly because they are not members of Linden Hills. They are outsiders who are able to determine right from wrong.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.