Skip to main content

Why does it make sense that this story takes place in a cantonment?

A cantonment is a military base in India.  The Kipling Society notes that the Segowlee Cantonment is a fictitious location; however, a cantonment is a real place where soldiers live and train.  A cantonment is a place for warriors.    


It makes sense that this story happens in a place where warriors live because Rikki-tikki is a warrior.  He may not be fighting humans, and he may not have human weapons of war, but that doesn't mean Rikki-tikki isn't a warrior with warrior weapons.  He's very quick, and has teeth that are capable of stabbing flesh for the killing blow.  Rikki-tikki is asked to put his warrior skills into practice during this story too.  He kills three deadly snakes over the course of the short story.  For a children's story, the body count is fairly high.  


The opening paragraph of the story also helps sell the cantonment setting.  



This is the story of the great war that Rikkitikki-tavi fought single-handed. . . 



Readers are introduced to a character fighting a war.  Active combat soldiers live in military bases.  Rikki-tikki is an active warrior in this story, and he is housed in a cantonment.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.