Skip to main content

In Romeo and Juliet, the Queen Mab speech is a metaphor for love. Why did Shakespeare use this idea for love?

In Act I, Scene 4 of Romeo and Juliet, Mercutio tells Romeo that Queen Mab has visited Romeo in his sleep. Queen Mab is a curious creature who is "no bigger than an agate stone/ On the forefinger of an alderman" (I.4.56-57). In other words, she is a tiny creature who is as big as a ring. Her mini wagon is pulled by a gnat. She rides through lovers' brains and makes them dream of love. When Queen Mab drives over the lips of women, they, "straight on kisses dream, /Which oft the angry Mab with blisters plagues, /Because their breaths with sweetmeats tainted are" (I.4.77-79). In other words, Queen Mab rides over women's lips, and they dream of kisses. Then, Queen Mab gives them blisters because their breath smells like candy, which she does not like. This story is a metaphor for the idea that love can bring with it suffering and punishment. Shakespeare used this story to foreshadow the punishment that will come to the lovers, Romeo and Juliet.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more