Skip to main content

In Sherry's "In Praise of the F Word," what is the central issue and why is it important?

In Sherry's article, the central issue is how to ensure that students learn material before being passed on to the next grade.


Sherry's thesis is that our current educational system fails children when it passes them to the next grade level even though they lack the basic skills. She believes this is why some students graduate from high school even though they are illiterate.  Sherry feels that this is the result of an educational system that no longer "flunks" students:



...I see a parade of students who are angry and resentful for having been passed along until they could no longer even pretend to keep up. Of average intelligence or better, they eventually quit school, concluding they were too dumb to finish. 'I should have been held back,' is a comment I hear frequently. Even sadder are those students who are high-school graduates who say to me after a few weeks of class, 'I don't know how I ever got a high-school diploma."



Sherry believes in the benefits of "flunking" students who have not mastered skills.  Her central issue is that if "flunking is a regular policy," it can motivate students to "learn the material presented to them."  Sherry argues that "the F word" can be a "positive teaching tool."


Sherry's central issue is an important one because it addresses the achievement gap between students who learn content and those who do not. Sherry believes that she has an answer that can help struggling students, suggesting that embracing "the F word" policy can facilitate "a dedicated, caring conspiracy between teachers and parents" and prevent students from illiteracy and disadvantage. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more