Skip to main content

Look over the article at http://cdn.theatlantic.com/assets/media/files/justice%20quarterly%20article%20Eterno%20Verma%20Silverman.pdf What is...

The theory in this article is that crime reports in New York City might contain flawed data, so relying on this data to measure police effectiveness in the city is problematic. For example, lower-ranking officers might be manipulating crime reports to conform to the demands of higher-ranking police officials and their efforts to make sure the data show lower crime rates. 


To operationalize this theory, an e-mail survey was sent to 1,962 retired New York City Police Department (NYPD) officers in 2012. Their e-mail addresses were found through the NYPD database of active retirees. Respondents were able to answer the survey anonymously, and, as they were retired, they did not have to fear workplace retribution for their answers to the survey. The analysis of the survey compared officers' answers about the manipulation of crime reports based on their years of retirement. The survey analysis also looked at whether the officers felt pressure to change crime reports so that they reflected reduced crime. Finally, the survey analysis looked at whether management pressure was what resulted in the manipulation of crime reports. 


The results showed that there was evidence that crime reports had been manipulated. The results also showed that crime report manipulation has increased over the years, and one possible reason for this growth over time has been a management culture that pressures officers to report lower crime rates. Further studies will have to be conducted to support or reject the study's conclusion that reports of New York City crime are not accurate and result from "gaming numbers" to continue the initial decrease in crime statistics at a time when crime was actually staying the same or going up.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more

What warning does Chuchundra issue to Rikki?

Chuchundra, the sniveling, fearful muskrat who creeps around walls because he is too terrified to go into the center of a room, meets Rikki in the middle of the night. He insults Rikki by begging him not to kill him. He then insults him by suggesting that Nag might mistake Chuchundra for Rikki. He says, "Those who kill snakes get killed by snakes."  He issues this warning to Rikki not to help keep Rikki safe but as a way of explaining why Rikki's presence gives him, Chuchundra, more reason to fear.  Chuchundra starts to tell Rikki what Chua the rat told him--but breaks it off when he realizes he might be overheard by Nag. He says, "Nag is everywhere, Rikki-Tikki." Rikki threatens to bite Chuchundra to get him to talk. Even then, Chuchundra won't overtly reveal any information. But he does say, "Can't you hear, Rikki-Tikki?" This is enough of a clue for the clever mongoose. He listens carefully and can just make out the "faintest scratch-s...
Post a Comment
Read more