Skip to main content

What are the three main parts of the Declaration of Independence?

The first part of the Declaration of Independence is probably the most famous and certainly the most often-quoted. It might be called a "statement of purpose," because in it Jefferson and the signers declared the reason for the document, which was to explain their justifications for declaring independence from Great Britain. However, it also included the statement of the unalienable rights of men, which included "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness," and a brief explanation of the social contract theory upon which the Declaration was based. Essentially, the Declaration states that the purpose of government is to preserve the fundamental rights of man, and that when governments fail to protect these rights, the people have the right to overthrow them.


The second part of the Declaration is a long list of grievances against King George. These grievances range from the King's refusal to approve beneficial laws passed by colonial legislatures  to his attempts to incite "merciless Indian savages" to attack the colonists during the preceding year. Each of these accusations was intended to show that the King violated the social contract described in the first part, and that the colonies thus had the right to declare independence.


Finally, the third part is an actual declaration of independence. The signers and the people they represented declared that all political connections between themselves and Great Britain were "dissolved," and that the colonies were now "independent states." 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...
Post a Comment
Read more