Skip to main content

What are the three main parts of the Declaration of Independence?

The first part of the Declaration of Independence is probably the most famous and certainly the most often-quoted. It might be called a "statement of purpose," because in it Jefferson and the signers declared the reason for the document, which was to explain their justifications for declaring independence from Great Britain. However, it also included the statement of the unalienable rights of men, which included "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness," and a brief explanation of the social contract theory upon which the Declaration was based. Essentially, the Declaration states that the purpose of government is to preserve the fundamental rights of man, and that when governments fail to protect these rights, the people have the right to overthrow them.


The second part of the Declaration is a long list of grievances against King George. These grievances range from the King's refusal to approve beneficial laws passed by colonial legislatures  to his attempts to incite "merciless Indian savages" to attack the colonists during the preceding year. Each of these accusations was intended to show that the King violated the social contract described in the first part, and that the colonies thus had the right to declare independence.


Finally, the third part is an actual declaration of independence. The signers and the people they represented declared that all political connections between themselves and Great Britain were "dissolved," and that the colonies were now "independent states." 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more