Skip to main content

In medieval society, was there a difference between the peasant way of life and the way the rich lived?

Typical medieval homes varied by country and even area.  Homes that are commonly associated with medieval times are the thatched roof cottages of England.  Dried mud over wood helped to create sturdy walls for the cottages.  In such homes, the family's life centered around the hearth.  The flames of the hearth fire were used to cook and boil water.  They also helped to keep the family warm during the cold winter months.  In some simple cottages, a hole in the roof served as a chimney.  This hole was not very efficient in channeling smoke outside.  This made the inside of the small cottages smoky.  Shutters were used to close small window openings, which had no glass.  This was for safety.  


The feudal system was strongly in place in medieval society.  Wealthier people lived in larger houses made of bricks or stones.  Often part of the house was made with half timbers.  Roofs of wealthier homes were typically made with tile shingles rather than thatch.  Chimneys and window glass became more widely used in larger homes.  Often there were multiple buildings on the properties of wealthy landowners.  These housed servants or farm animals.  The poor peasants, who were sometimes serfs, had to work very hard.  They worked long hours and sometimes had to pay taxes to the lord.  Serfs needed the permission from the lord to do many things.  Wealthier people also had to work hard.  They had more freedom in their lives, however.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.