Skip to main content

How is religion important in Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet?

In Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet, the characters have a dual relationship with religion. On the one hand, they see religion as playing a key role in all major aspects of their lives such as marriage and death. On the other hand, none of the characters are what one would call devout Christians, as the tenants of Christianity do not affect their everyday lives, evident by immoral behavior like their constant fighting.


Evidence that religion plays a part in the major aspects of the characters' lives is seen in the fact that both Romeo and Juliet go to Friar Lawrence for advice concerning lust, marriage, and death. In the scene when Romeo goes to Friar Lawrence to ask him to perform the wedding, it becomes evident that Romeo sees Friar Lawrence as important enough in his life for Romeo to have confessed to Friar Laurence his feelings for Rosaline, as we see when Friar Laurence exclaims, "God pardon sin! wast thou with Rosaline?" (Act II, Scene 3, line 44).


Yet, despite the fact that Friar Laurence plays such a major part in the two main characters' lives, none of the characters really act upon Christian principles, as seen in the fact that the Capulets and Montagues are engaged in a senseless feud. Friar Lawrence indicates he is well aware of and very distressed by his parishioners' inability to uphold Christian values. In fact, he agrees to marry Romeo to Juliet only because he hopes their marriage will end the two families' hatred:



In one respect I'll thy assistant be;
For this alliance may so happy prove,
To turn your households' rancour to pure love (Act II, Scene 3, lines 90-93).



The "rancour," or hatred, the two families feel for each other shows they are not upholding the Christian value of love. The characters' actions show they have a rather hypocritical view of religion; while they acknowledge its importance, they don't actually see it as important enough to act upon.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more