Skip to main content

Did Oscar Wilde's self-proclaimed anarchy and individualism affect his play, The Importance of Being Earnest? If so, how?

One can definitely see elements of anarchy and individualism at work in Oscar Wilde's The Importance of Being Earnest. First of all, much of the play lampoons the attitudes and manners of the upper classes, as it hilariously comments on and exposes the trivialities of the rich. There are some elements of anarchy in this comedic process, as Wilde's depiction of the upper classes demolishes the wealthy establishment by revealing its shallow lack of substance. Of course, it's important to note that, even if Wilde is demolishing the foundations of the upper classes, he never does so with venom. Rather, the play maintains a light and funny tone, and so any criticisms are subtle and are often delivered, most surprisingly, in an affectionate manner. 


Additionally, Wilde's individualism can be observed in his perfectly crafted dialogue and writing. Time and again, Wilde has his characters engaging in surprising, witty, and often scandalous turns of phrase. More specifically, his characters are continuously doing that which we least expect them to do. For instance, when Algernon and Jack's love interests simultaneously rebuke their deceptions, the two men deal with their feelings by squabbling over muffins. Surprising moments like these and the masterful language that accompanies them truly bring out Wilde's unique and individualistic spirit. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.