Skip to main content

I need help with a postgraduate essay. I want to compare two novels from the Gothic era, Wuthering Heights by Emily Bronte and The Brownie of...

The first thing you will need to do to create work on the postgraduate level is to sort out some factual details.


The Gothic period was the late eighteenth century. Wuthering Heights, although borrowing some of the literary conventions of the Gothic, was written in 1845, considerably later than the classic works of Gothic fiction such as The Castle of Otranto or The Mysteries of UdolphoThe Brownie of Bodsbeck (1818) is somewhat closer to the traditional Gothic in period, and in its historical Scottish setting resembles The Bride of Lammermoor (1819), blending a Gothic atmosphere with Scottish regionalism. Thus one issue you need to mention is the 27 years between the composition of the two novels and the difference in situations of the authors (Hogg was a Scottish man, Brontë an English woman).


Next, you should note that Katherine is not, in fact, "horrible" nor is she actually possessed by an evil spirit. The "Brownie" turns out to be John Brown, a man fighting for religious freedom. As for Catherine Earnshaw, she is an ambivalent character, but one should note that as Heathcliff is violent, vindictive, cruel, prone to unpredictable emotional outbursts, and abusive, Linton would be a far more sensible choice for far more than just monetary reasons; he would also be a better father as Heathcliff engages in what we now would consider child abuse.


Both novels have a wide range of female characters. Interestingly, the characters portrayed as having the most knowledge, and often holding information unknown to the protagonists are female domestic servants, Nanny in Hogg's novel and Nelly Dean in Wuthering Heights. This suggests an interesting way to organize a paper by thinking about how class and gender intersect. In both cases, lower class women bear some form of true knowledge and sustain local traditions and memories, often almost subversively, keeping secrets from the upper classes and men, and having a power rooted in observation and empathy. 


For a postgraduate paper, you want to avoid such terms as "horrible" and attempts to judge literary characters as though they are actual people. Instead, you want to think about the construction of female characters in the novels as reflecting historical or ideological contexts. You might look at how the women of The Brownie of Bodsbeck operate within traditional feminized spaces, and end up achieving the closure of happy endings in their role as nurturing and supportive, while the women of Wuthering Heights are far more conflicted in their roles. 


In writing an essay, you might want to narrow your focus. You could look at the difference between Hogg's concern with nationalism and religion and Brontë's purely psychological fiction or think about what the two authors consider the ideal of womanhood for women of different classes. Another possibility would be to look at the language used to describe women in both novels or the way the viewpoints and narrators affect how we see the women of the novels.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.