Skip to main content

During their first confrontation in "Rikki-Tikki-Tavi," how are Rikki and Nag feeling?

Both Rikki and Nag are afraid during their first confrontation, and rightly so. Each represents a formidable threat to the life of the other. Nag hides his fear behind threats and bravado. He brags about his looks and his origins as having been specially created by Brahm. He spreads his hood in a threatening fashion. Despite this bravado, he knows mongooses in the garden are a death sentence for cobras. He shifts to a conciliatory tone, attempting to distract Rikki long enough for Nagaina to creep up behind him and strike.


Rikki is "afraid for the minute" when he sees Nag's display and hears his words. The innate courage and confidence of his species make him unable to remain fearful for long. He realizes mongooses are born and live to "fight and eat snakes," and his spirit rises to the challenge. He confronts Nag forthrightly for eating "fledglings out of a nest," allowing his anger and sense of justice to override his fears. 


As it turns out, Rikki is able to dispose of Nag, Nagaina, and their offspring. Nag's fear and Rikki's confidence foreshadow the eventual outcome of the story.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...

A man has a garden measuring 84 meters by 56 meters. He divides it into the minimum number of square plots. What is the length of the square plots?

We wish to divide this man's garden into the minimum number of square plots possible. A square has all four sides with the same length.Our garden is a rectangle, so the answer is clearly not 1 square plot. If we choose the wrong length for our squares, we may end up with missing holes or we may not be able to fit our squares inside the garden. So we have 84 meters in one direction and 56 meters in the other direction. When we start dividing the garden in square plots, we are "filling" those lengths in their respective directions. At each direction, there must be an integer number of squares (otherwise, we get holes or we leave the garden), so that all the square plots fill up the garden nicely. Thus, our job here is to find the greatest common divisor of 84 and 56. For this, we prime factor both of them: `56 = 2*2*2*7` `84 = 2*2*3*7` We can see that the prime factors and multiplicities in common are `2*2*7 = 28` . This is the desired length of the square plots. If you wi...