Skip to main content

How are laws made and implemented in a federal system and in a unitary system?

The best way to answer this question is to say that laws in a unitary system are made and implemented from the top down while laws in a federal system can be made and implemented in a more decentralized way.


In a unitary system, the national government has essentially all of the power.  It tells the lower levels of government what they can and cannot do.  Laws are created by the national government, not by the lower levels of government.  The national government tells the lower levels of government how to implement the laws.  This is all very top-down.


In a federal system, things can be more decentralized.  Of course, the national government still has the power to make laws.  However, the states (or provinces, or whatever the lower levels of government are called) also have the independent power to make laws.  The states are not simply limited to implementing laws that the national government makes.  When the national government does make laws, the laws may at times be implemented in a more decentralized way.  The lower levels of government may be able to have some amount of say in how the laws are carried out.


Overall, the national government has much more power in a unitary system than it has in a federal system.  This means that the laws in a unitary system are generally made and carried out in a much more centralized way in a federal system.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more