Skip to main content

What is the significance of the "holy edifice" in Act 1, scene 1 of The Merchant of Venice?

The reference to a church is made by Salarino during their conversation about Antonio's depressed mood. He says, in part:


Should I go to church
And see the holy edifice of stone,


Salarino and Salanio are concerned about their friend's sadness and are trying to establish what has put him in this melancholy mood.


'Holy edifice of stone' refers to a church building constructed of stone. The significance of Salarino's reference lies in the fact that seeing the church building which is secure and strong, would make him immediately reflect about the dangers his ship would have to face at sea. He is, in fact, drawing a contrast between the solidity and power of a rock and the fragile nature of a ship. Dangerous rocks would destroy a ship if it should, even gently, touch its sides. He would, at once have lost not only his ship but also his merchandise which, obviously, would drive him to tears.


The church building, made of stone, is also symbolic of the strength of one's faith. The church is a symbol of the power of belief. The ship, in this allusion is a fragile vessel and represents humanity. What Salarino is suggesting is that the church, symbol of a person's faith, is more powerful than anything and, therefore, offers protection. Anything or anyone who does not believe in its power can be utterly destroyed, just as a ship can be destroyed by dangerous rocks.


Furthermore, Salarino's metaphoric reference also stems from the fact that sailors would visit the church before leaving on an arduous journey, asking for guidance and protection. The church reminds him of the power of nature and how easily one can be destroyed by its force. He suggests that one can have something and then, suddenly, have nothing if one should veer off course and crash into dangerous rocks, both literally and metaphorically. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is there a word/phrase for "unperformant"?

As a software engineer, I need to sometimes describe a piece of code as something that lacks performance or was not written with performance in mind. Example: This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. Based on my Google searches, this isn't a real word. What is the correct way to describe this? EDIT My usage of "performance" here is in regard to speed and efficiency. For example, the better the performance of code the faster the application runs. My question and example target the negative definition, which is in reference to preventing inefficient coding practices. Answer This kind of coding style leads to unmaintainable and unperformant code. In my opinion, reads more easily as: This coding style leads to unmaintainable and poorly performing code. The key to well-written documentation and reports lies in ease of understanding. Adding poorly understood words such as performant decreases that ease. In addressing the use of such a poorly ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Is 'efficate' a word in English?

I routinely hear the word "efficate" being used. For example, "The most powerful way to efficate a change in the system is to participate." I do not find entries for this word in common English dictionaries, but I do not have an unabridged dictionary. I have checked the OED (I'm not sure if it is considered unabridged), and it has no entry for "efficate". It does have an entry for "efficiate", which is used in the same way. Wordnik has an entry for "efficate" with over 1800 hits, thus providing some evidence for the frequency of use. I personally like the word and find the meaning very clear and obvious when others use it. If it's not currently an "officially documented" word, perhaps its continued use will result in it being better documented.
Post a Comment
Read more